Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, Stevie Wonder and more musicians demand protection against AI (2024)

A group of more than 200 high-profile musicians have signed an open letter calling for protections against the predatory use of artificial intelligence that mimics human artists’ likenesses, voices and sound. The signatories span musical genres and eras, ranging from A-list stars such as Billie Eilish, J Balvin and Nicki Minaj to Rock and Roll Hall of Famers like Stevie Wonder and REM. The estates of Frank Sinatra and Bob Marley are also signatories.

The letter, which was issued by the Artist Rights Alliance advocacy group, makes the broad demand that technology companies pledge not to develop AI tools that undermine or replace human songwriters and artists.

“This assault on human creativity must be stopped. We must protect against the predatory use of AI to steal professional artists’ voices and likenesses, violate creators’ rights, and destroy the music ecosystem,” the letter states.

The letter does not call for an outright ban on the use of AI in music or production, saying that responsible use of the technology could have benefits for the industry. Music producers have used artificial intelligence tools in a variety of ways in recent years, in one case employing AI to isolate John Lennon’s vocals from an old demo track and use them to create a “new” Beatles song which was released last year.

The Artist Rights Alliance letter is part of an industry-wide pushback from artists and creators against the use of generative artificial intelligence, as the technology continues to present ethical and legal issues surrounding copyright infringement and labor rights. Artist unions and advocacy organizations have sought to pressure lawmakers and tech companies to regulate the use of AI, while studios have become interested in its potential for reducing production costs.

Concern over AI being used to write songs and scripts, or produce images and video of actors and entertainers, was at the center of several contract negotiations and entertainment industry union strikes in 2023. The spread of p*rnographic AI-made images of Taylor Swift also drew additional attention to the malicious use of deepfakes, and earlier this year prompted lawmakers to introduce a bill aimed at criminalizing non-consensual, AI-generated sexualized imagery. Just last week, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI delayed the release of a program that can mimic voices over concerns of responsible use.

In March, Tennessee became the first US state to enact legislation directly intended to protect musicians from having their vocal likeness generated by AI for commercial purposes. The Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act or “Elvis Act” goes into effect on 1 July, and makes it illegal to replicate an artists’ voice without their consent. That legislation did not address artists’ work being used as data to train AI models, a practice that has resulted in several lawsuits against companies such as OpenAI and is mentioned in the letter.

“Some of the biggest and most powerful companies are, without permission, using our work to train AI models,” the letter states. “These efforts are directly aimed at replacing the work of human artists with massive quantities of AI-created ‘sounds’ and ‘images’ that substantially dilute the royalty pools that are paid out to artists.”

The Artist Rights Alliance is a non-profit organization run by music industry veterans, such as board member Rosanne Cash – daughter of Johnny Cash. It is unclear how the organization recruited the artists who signed the letter, which include country stars such as Kacey Musgraves, rappers such as Q-Tip and younger indie pop stars including Chappell Roan. The Artist Rights Alliance did not immediately return a request for comment.

Estates representing deceased artists are also among the signatories to the letter. There has been an increased debate within the entertainment industry over how artists’ likenesses can be used after their death, with AI tools demonstrating a growing ability to create realistic video based on old footage. Several AI versions of dead actors and musicians have appeared in film, video games and television in recent years, prompting controversy and ethical debates.

As AI tools become more publicly available and pervasive, musicians have increasingly been forced to stake out a position on what is a permissible use of artificial intelligence. A few artists, such as Grimes, have viewed generative AI‘s ability to create simulacra of their work as an opportunity to experiment or to encourage fans to make songs using their vocal likeness.

Other musicians have expressed more negative feelings about imitations of their musical stylings. In January of last year, a fan asked ChatGPT to generate lyrics in the style of the singer-songwriter Nick Cave and asked the artist what he thought of the result.

“This song is bullsh*t, a grotesque mockery of what it is to be human,” Cave responded.

Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, Stevie Wonder and more musicians demand protection against AI (2024)

FAQs

What musicians are fighting against AI? ›

A petition to protect artist rights that was sent to AI developers was published by the Artist Rights Alliance on April 1 with the signatures of over 200 celebrities. Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj and Katy Perry were among the petitioners.

What 200 artists are against AI? ›

Over 200 Leading Artists Rally Against AI Tech In Call for Responsible Music Innovation. Industry luminaries to sign the petition include Metro Boomin, FINNEAS, Hit-Boy, Chase & Status and Billie Eilish, among many others.

What artists are signed against AI? ›

Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, Jon Bon Jovi and over 200 artists call for protections against “predatory use of AI”

Is Nicki Minaj's album cover AI? ›

While Nicki Minaj's AI-generated imagery, in promotion of her 2023 album Pink Friday 2, led to a series of bandwagon-jumping memes.

Is AI music a threat to musicians? ›

The letter highlights AI threats including deepfakes and voice cloning, as well as “irresponsible uses of AI” such as the using AI sound to diminish royalty payments to artists and the use of musical works by AI developers without permission to train and produce AI copycats.

What musicians are worried about AI? ›

Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, Stevie Wonder and more musicians demand protection against AI. A group of more than 200 high-profile musicians have signed an open letter calling for protections against the predatory use of artificial intelligence that mimics human artists' likenesses, voices and sound.

Why is AI art illegal? ›

Why can't AI content be copyrighted? For a product to be copyrighted, a human creator is needed. AI-generated content can't be copyrighted because it isn't considered to be the work of a human creator.

Is AI a threat to artists? ›

AI Generated Art is undeniably incredible and intricate. It makes it easier than ever to fabricate imaginative pieces by using instructions, yet there's also a downside - AI can make art-making too effortless and hinder chances for artists to demonstrate their inventiveness.

What artist was banned for looking like AI? ›

In an Ironic Twist, an Illustrator Was Banned From a Reddit Forum for Posting Art That Looked Too Much Like an A.I. -Generated Image. Moderators of the subreddit told the artist, "You need to find a different style." Ben Moran, A Muse in Warzone.

What artists are against AI? ›

The list includes Hall of Famers, with the collective crossing numerous musical genres. Some of the people and bands featured are Stevie Wonder, Smokey Robinson, Billie Eilish, Jon Bon Jovi, Katy Perry, REM, Pearl Jam, the estate of Bob Marley, and the estate of Frank Sinatra.

Has AI taken over artists? ›

Reluctant Adoption, But Not Replacement

The answer is not as straightforward as it may seem. While AI is definitely shaking things up in the art and design world, it's not about to fully replace human designers. But there's no putting the genie back in the bottle either; AI is already here.

Who are the visual artists suing AI? ›

Photographer Jingna Zhang and cartoonists Sarah Andersen, Hope Larson and Jessica Fink said in the proposed class action , opens new tab filed Friday that Google is liable for misusing "billions" of copyrighted images, including theirs, to teach Imagen how to respond to human text prompts.

Why is it called Gag City? ›

Minaj and her fans, known as the Barbz, embraced the imagery. Minaj and the Barbz began referring to the lead-up to the album as a journey to Gag City, a reference to the LGBTQ slang term "gag," meaning to be awestruck by something.

What record is Nicki Minaj under? ›

On Friday 3 March, Nicki Minaj went onto her radio station Queen Radio to announce that she was starting her own label, though she kept the details to a minimum. Last night (13 March) she returned to the station to reveal the name of her new venture, Heavy On It Records.

Which artist complains about AI art? ›

One of the biggest problems digital artists cite with AI art generators is the issue of how they got the data they use to create new works. Or rather, the pieces they splice together, since the works in question aren't actually created from scratch.

Is AI going to eliminate artists? ›

But like the image-generating systems, AI music will be a mashup of what is already out there. It will require the collaboration of human artists to point it in novel directions and determine whether the output is even worthwhile. AI will not replace artists in the future; instead, they will be needed more than ever.

Why are artists angry at AI? ›

Why Artists Dislike AI-Generated Images
  • AI disrupts traditional art forms:
  • AI Threatens their livelihood:
  • There's a lack of human touch:
  • AI images lack originality:
  • AI steals and learns from publicly available imagery.
  • Many people are debating ethical concerns:
  • Artists lose control:

Are artists threatened by AI art? ›

Airbrush artists feel AI art threatens their livelihoods.

It refers to works of art produced by artificial intelligence, and it implies that robots may replace people in some occupations. This technology has recently made headlines since many artists fear it would endanger their careers and devalue their work.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Prof. An Powlowski

Last Updated:

Views: 5812

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Prof. An Powlowski

Birthday: 1992-09-29

Address: Apt. 994 8891 Orval Hill, Brittnyburgh, AZ 41023-0398

Phone: +26417467956738

Job: District Marketing Strategist

Hobby: Embroidery, Bodybuilding, Motor sports, Amateur radio, Wood carving, Whittling, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Prof. An Powlowski, I am a charming, helpful, attractive, good, graceful, thoughtful, vast person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.